Saturday, October 23, 2010

POINT3

Throughout this unit I have come to realize that at this point in time architecture only consists of alternatives. People are looking back towards the foundations set by previous architects and designers and exploring boundaries and eventually advance to breaking rules in order to reflect people’s perspectives.

The renaissance was about the revival of old ideas as well as the learning of culture. When looking at architecture during this time you can see that many element of the architecture resembles that of the past but it is used in ways that reflected society as a whole. They revive the classical style and explore it through boundaries on a single decorated façade which in essences shows history. These façade are designed as a way to let the viewer create an idea of a building and this idea is repeated throughout the rest of the structure.

When taking from the past there is a need to make thing one’s own, by doing this people are creating alternative structures and details which reflect upon the ones of the past, meaning that although there are similarities there are great differences too. This is where breaking the rules and testing boundaries comes into play. The Baroque style is a perfect example of this. The Baroque period focuses on illusions and providing a sense of theatricality and movement. For example, the Trevi Fountain in Italy is a sculpted fountain protruding off of a façade of a structure in other word it is breaking the boundaries set for facades before it.

Alternatives of European architecture can also be view in the architecture of America. Since European colonies were based in America they used what they know of architecture tweaked it in order to make it their own and distanced themselves from Europe. In doing this a lot of what we see in America is also seen in Europe, it is as if someone was standing in from of a photocopier and making copy after copy and somewhere down the line the copy will eventually not be the same as the original but it would be apparent of what that copy was based off of.

From what I’ve gathered of this unit is that architecture is like a pizza. It first started in Italy and some traveler came along and loved it. He them went home and tried to recreate it making minor adjustment, whether it was because he didn’t like something on it or that a certain ingredient was not available to him. From there he had his friends taste it who also brought it home and attempted to recreate it. This went on for a long time and now we have the pizza we see today. And if you think about it the pizza we have today reflects society as a whole. We are lazy and don’t want to make our own pizza therefore we have Digiorno’s frozen pizza!

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Reading composition 4

[1]

artifact
Sheraton chair p.522- delicate, symmetrical, urn, swags – classical language
State bed p.502- intricate, mass, delicate ornament, high ornament, wreaths?, repetition, square and circle- dome?, collenette, aedicule- escape
Tall clock p. 473- high ornament, delicate intricacy, swags – classical language, modular, similar to a column- base, shaft, and capital, gilding, swags, cherubs, boundaries, order, symmetry
Windsor chair p.451- delicate, intricate, symmetrical, order, appearance of boundaries
Desk p.427- high ornament, pictorial, flower motif, compartmentalized into geometric shapes- squares, rectangles, hidden elements, displayed wealth- work of art and also functional, showed taste
Space-
Holkham p. 418- rosettes within octagons, dynamic texture, mimicked wall pattern to upholstery, significant contrast between wallpaper and the ceiling and the upholstery, high ornament, broken pediment similar to temple, repetition/contrast, pattern, organized, placed with purpose, contrast in scale of patterns
Gunston Hal p.447- stairs used as an architectural element to be celebrated vs. only being functional, now a statement, became their own space, symmetry, balance of space, repetition- each stair has a banister that corresponds to it that are evenly spaced- balance through repetition
Marie Antoinette p.463- theatrical, high ornament, ordered by pattern but excessively busy, so excessive that the order almost feel chaotic, no sense of direction, don’t know where the eyes should go
Saltram House Saloon p.494- parlor, patterned, compartmentalized, swags, classical motif, symmetry, central arc window with two flat edged windows
Gardner Pingree p.519- subdued ornament, removed from high ornamentation, classical language, focal point- fireplace, symmetry, central motif planked two swags, centralized ornament on walls (urns), design elements mimicked throughout (fireplaces, and encasement to entrance of room), molding that emphasizes the lines of the room, but also provides a transition from the wall to the ceiling, celebrates the openings, sense of order- prefer things that look finished not abrupt change, prefer something to transition us into the space
Chiswick p.409- based on la rotunda, taking design risks, taking further steps into forming complex geometric shapes, building not high adorned or embellished, sense of calm, focus on symmetry/geometry vs ornament, beauty- minimalist classism, contrast not through ornament but through form that has to do with light
Drayton hall p.437- porticos to mark the front elevation , mimics classical design Doric columns on the bottom, ionic on the top, symmetry, instead of a dome- square on top of square, repetition, emphasis on entrance (told through color- portico encased in white vs brick), different repetition of columns and windows, elements that repeat are the same color (font), even chimneys are symmetrical
St. Genevieve p.460- Greece meets rome Parthenon on base and tempietto san pietro, monumental in scale, public s private, high mass in columns, emphasis on front (columns only on front), engaged pilasters along sides and on center---go in through front to get to center, contrast between solid and void
Nathaniel Russel p.488l- balustrade at top, repeating elements at different scales, windows, , based off of palazzo Medici (bottom to top, public to private), scales help delineate the façade and shows where each floor is on the exterior
Monticello p. 513- portico, dome on top of rectangle, similar to chiswick, octagonal dome, balustrade, clerestory windows of sorts for light in upper room, symmetry, repetition, axial progression towards saloon, then offshoots to private quarters--- separation of public and private, symmetrical balance creates harmony and clarity, but the geometric form different layers, rooms protrude out= more dynamic than buildings of its time, has more volume than traditional symmetrical architecture


artifacts

These artifacts have a common design language that links them together. The Sheraton chair, Tall Clock, Windsor chair, and Desk are all made to fit into a space, and in order to create harmony within a space they are designed with symmetry and the order of the architecture is reflected as well in order to increase harmony and the unity of the space. each piece is intricately detailed with ornamentation within boundaries, this creates an emphasis on the owners good tastes and wealth.

Space

Although styles vary from space to space a common design language can still be seen. Holkham, Gunston Hall, Marie Antoinette, Saltram House Saloon, and Gardner Pingree are all ornamented as an emphasis of what each space is attempting to portray as well as how the owner wants to be portrayed. The ideas of elements such as line are emphasized in each space with a series or borders showing proportions of the spaces as well as a balance with the use of symmetry.

Building

The way I see it is that the Chiswick house, Dayton Hall, St. Genevieve, Nathaniel Russel, and Monticello all have a similar design language. Each building can be related to principals and elements used in the past as well as other buildings. On the exterior of each building you can see repetition and symmetry. There is also an emphasis on geometric forms which have been seen in the past and have been reinvented to become harmonious with these building styles.

place

I believe that the places (England, VA, Paris, New Town, and DC) have a commons language because America looked to Europe as a prototype and as people migrated to America much of what they know about architecture reflected in what was being built. in a way architecture " became what Renaissance architecture was not"(Roth, p.397).



[2] 

england

Gateleg Table(p.264): wood, spindle legs, retractable table, repetition of ornamental motifs and geometric shapes
hart house hall + chamber(p. 260): wood, beamed ceiling, contrast, low ceiling, multipurpose space, cozy, limited light, no decorations, emphasis of simplicity, repetition.
parson capen house(p. 255): small windows, simple, symmetrical, steep roof, dark palette.
boston, ma
spain
Fraileurs(p.283) : decorative detail, repeated motif, Geometric shapes mixed with fluidity, balance and proportional elements.
columbus house(p. 283): beamed ceiling, contrasting palette, detailed ornamentation, repetition of geometric shapes, centrality, open
entry governor's palace (santa fe)(p. 277): horizontal repetition, contrast, smooth, structure showing, geometric, open
st. augustine, fl
france
Armoirs(p.302) : compartmentalized space, symmetrical on an x + y axis, contained boundaries, functionality, geometric space + repetition.
parlange plantation (see plan)(p.292): geometric, boundaries, public versus private, centrality, vernacular mixed with high style
houssaye house(p. 292): stacking, repetition, balanced separation, hierarchy, shows structure, living versus working/storage
new orleans, la
germany/holland
Shrank(p.313) : separation of boundaries, hierarchy, geometric shapes, wood as a material, symmetrical and a balanced separation of public + private spaces
parlor + chamber ,Andrew jackson house(p. 310): beamed ceiling, low intimate space, rustic, multifunctional, simplistic, contrast
single brother's house, salem, nc(p. 307): stacking, geometric, boundaries, sections, mixed materials, showing structure, many windows.
new york city, ny


The English neo Palladian was before Palladio and was drawn from Inigo Jones and Vitruvius as well as the Baroque style. Roth quotes Henry Millon when he says "baroque space is independent and alive- it flows and leads to dramatic culmination" (Roth, p.397), I believe this is what this period is attempting to grasp. During this period there was a focus on country houses, small dwellings, and town houses. Within the architecture you could observe classical details such as ornamentation and the composition showed symmetrical and horizontal all seen in the classical period. The interiors during this period varied from grand to less significant also spoke a classical language. They were also were elaborately decorated and showed monumental proportions. The main elements at this time were structural as well as aesthetically pleasing. A very important thing to keep in mind during the English neo Palladian period is that they followed the rule of design closely.

The American Georgian period focused on the English colonies settling down in America. In order to do this they were looking to discover their own culture, manners, and civility. They looked to England (their homeland) as a prototype in order to base their architecture. In doing do so, their architecture resembled that of England with gentility, formality, and sophistication. During the American Georgian period the domestic buildings were situated near agricultural areas as well as transportation routes for practicality. The interiors at this time reflect the symmetry of the exterior. The design concepts seem to emphasize unity and this is shown through borders and outlines.

The Louis XVI period is Rococo in style and focuses on rational planning and mathematical proportions, with an emphasis on straight lines as well as geometric forms and curves. Simplicity is greatly thought of during this period, with facades consisting of minimal ornamentation and interiors bases of the human scale. The concepts of stability, repose, and clarity were seen in the designs during the Louis XVI period.

The French provincial period was emphasized in rural areas consisting of peasants and bourgeoisie. Much of the local tastes and traditions were seen in the designs but wealth played a role in determining the outcome of the design. It was basically the vernacular interpretation of the high style.There was a strong prominence of functionality therefore much of the structures and ornamentations remained simple

As the European colonies migrated to America they took their knowledge or architecture from their homeland and adapted an alternative in order to reflect their society. They used the principals and elements of design such as repetition, contrast, proportion, and space, as a reference and constructed on the ideas of the past. For example, pizza began in Italy and eventually made its way through time and became what we know pizza as today in America. Through its course from Italy to America it was changed many times in order to reflect the societies whether through its form or ingredients but the harmony of the flavors remain delicious.




[3]


[4]

I believe that the Baroque period stands as a form of social performance in the theatre of the world, "architecture has become but one constituent part in what was "a total work of art"."( Roth, p.404). If you consider the world as a stage during the baroque period you can see that a lot of the architecture is acting. There is a lack of boundaries and a testing of limits which lead to trickery of the eye, in other words Baroque art produces an illusion not only of presence but of motion in the sense that a physicist would understand it: the displacement of a body with mass through three-dimensional space over time. In this sense, baroque art is theatrical: the illusion of motion produces an effect that is both figuratively and literally dramatic.”(Larry F. Norman). During this period the boundaries are inevitably broken and nothing is as it seems, for example Bernini’s Baldacchino looks as if it is draped with fabric but in reality the piece is carved of wood in order to make the viewer perceive it as draped fabric. In saying this during the Baroque period “A wall is never simply a wall, nor a ceiling, a ceiling. Each architectural element is extended beyond its functional duty as a shield from the hostile elements. The aesthetic component of the object, its form, overtakes its function. A wall or a ceiling becomes a possible opening onto the reality which it occludes.” (Larry F. Norman).

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

POINT2


 









Throughout our history architecture has evolved. The foundation of architecture began with the ancient civilizations and has gone through the process of being passes from one society to then next and being adapted throughout the course of history into what we see and inhabit at the present day. The ancient societies such as Egypt, Greece, and Rome provided most of the foundations with archetypes, prototypes, and hybrids that influenced the societies and enable them to learn and move forward, creating their own styles which reflected their culture.

Egypt is widely known for its life source, the Nile which runs through the center. Because the Nile is what keeps Egypt fertile and alive they tended to incorporate it into to their architecture, an example would be the papyrus column. Egyptians also based their architecture off of their beliefs. They believe in the afterlife and permanence which was reflected by the scale of their architecture. The tombs such as the pyramids of Giza and temple of Hatshepsut are a very clear example of how gender influenced the design. The pyramids stand out against its surroundings, where as the temple of Hatshepsut is more horizontal and is concealed near the base of a cliff. Although the designs of these monuments were very different they were still constructed by stacking stones and this technique was the foundation for what was to come.

Greece used Egypt as a base for their design. In treating Egypt as a prototype they were able to learn and expand upon it to create the "ideal" architectural structures. They incorporated columns as well as stacking into their architecture because it was a method of firmness. However they designed a lot of their architecture around Greek mythology and their many Gods. Male and female gender roles were still seen in the architecture but were less prominent. For example, the Parthenon dedicated to Athena is very dominant compared to its surroundings. So as for Greece, it borrows and developed the ideas from Egypt in order to create the ideal and in turn ended up with something real.

Rome looked back to Egypt and Greece in order to use their architectural elements as a basis to move forward. Rome is taking what they have seen and modernizing it. They took all of the previous styles and combined them in order to create an instant history. Columns evolved into more of a decoration rather than a structural component. They also developed the arch which took the place of the post and lintel and was much more structurally sound. With this they were able to construct something as magnificent as the Coliseum, which consists of many arches as well as many different styles. By being able to incorporate architectural elements from the past and grow from them Rome’s architecture was the start of something new and was a good foundation in order to move forward.

As I see it the ancient societies started architecture and from them it evolved into what we see all around us today and it is constantly evolving as we learn and experience new times. When we look around us we still see many of the architectural elements that have excelled and lasted for centuries in a way preserving the history of ancient cultures through architecture.

http://stockphotosofarchitecture.com/images/070607152108_Roman_Coliseum_LG.jpg



http://lipsticktocrayons.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/7wonders-pyramids_of_giza.jpg

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Friday, October 1, 2010

reading composition 3


[1] Compare and contrast the cathedrals according to the matrix. To illustrate your post, hand draw aview of your “main” cathedral, scan it and place it at the top of your response. Your written thoughtsshould fully illuminate the questions asked with each cathedral pairing on the website.

http://www.uncg.edu/~pllucas/Gothic Cathedrals/website 03.31.08/timelineNEW.htm

Symbol- Florence vs Cologne
The Florence cathedral and the Cologne cathedral both have many symbols but most of them are in fact different. They both stand for different things.
The Florence Cathedral in some ways rivals the Pantheon. Brunelleschi, the designer of the Cathedral, goes to Rome and uses their architecture as precedent for the Florence Cathedral. With this is brings back to classical style in ways keeping in mind humanism, classicism, and man is the center of the universe. Instead of creating something new he is inspired from the past. I believe that it was received by the community because it stands out from what people are used to and expressed a new statement, in a way it is an innovation for people looking to innovate. Its concentration is much more about the form rather than the experience.
The Cologne Cathedral is visually much more gothic. Its main symbol is to portray a heavenly experience. It uses flying buttresses in order to allow more windows to create a sense of dematerialization and verticality in order to make the person feel smaller compared to God. The exterior of the cathedral in a way symbolized people carrying a cross in order to be granted acceptance to heaven.
Both cathedrals have a crucifix form pertaining to the Catholic religion and symbolizing holiness and a way to heaven.

Impression- Florence vs Salisbury
The Florence Cathedral concentrate more on a simple geometric form and uses a classical language where as the Salisbury Cathedral is much more vertical and show many more gothic qualities and it also displaces the classical language. The Florence Cathedra’s palette is much lighter compared to the Salisbury Cathedral. I believe that the Florence Cathedral is much more colorful because it is something new and innovative in a way and the design was chosen by competition where as the Salisbury sticks the what they know of gothic architecture and making a religious experience with its use of flying buttresses, verticality, and stained glass.

Language- Florence vs Amiens
Amiens Cathedrals design concentrates on the standardization of gothic cathedrals, where as the Florence Cathedral bring in a new kind of language concerning form leading to the renaissance. I believe that the Florence Cathedrals language makes more sense because it is moving forward and that is what society is doing at this point. In my opinion the ornamentation in the Florence Cathedral does symbolize change because it is moving away from the rigid gothic style of many other cathedrals and the Amiens Cathedrals gothic ornamentation concentrate on creating a heavenly experience.




[2] This illustration from A Medieval Home Companion depicts woman at work in a medieval interior.Unfortunately, the image is closely cropped so we don’t see much of the rest of the dwelling in which she works. Using Harwood and Roth, complete the rest of the scene using words and images todemonstrate your understanding of the domestic medieval interior .















The domestic medieval life was live slightly through paranoia because of the governmental system at this time. The feudal society demanded fortified places to reside. Which is why the castle because prominent at this time for their safer characteristics such as the wall surrounding the homes (Roth, pg. 305). The residences also did not contain much furniture because of the fear of theft and constant having to pack up quickly and leave. This I probably they there are few things in the interior where the women is.